Comments on: In the beginning was the Vibration… http://holyscience.wordpress.com by Nito Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:35:09 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Nito http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-10 Nito Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:40:39 +0000 http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-10 Interesting question Vipul, one that splits the world apart; right along the sectarian lines (where science counts as a sect too)! I suspect that you want a scientific answer, but the problem is that science itself does not know what God is (i.e. it knows about God as much as the older brother religion tells it). So how can you prove or disprove something when there is no clear definition of the "problem area". However, if we borrow some of the definitions of God from religion like "He is the source of all", "He is omnipresent", "He is omnipotent", "He is eternal (i.e. outside of space and time)" then Zoran's "Geometric Concept of Matter" proves each one of these definitions (of course if the theory itself is positively verified by the broader scientific community) ;-) On the other hand, how do you prove that God does not exist? This is the burden that science took upon itself, and we are still waiting for the definite proof. Can you really assume that because there is no need for Something, therefore certainly It does not exist? Or can you really assume that by disputing few statements in the Bible you can negate the God of ALL religions? Interesting question Vipul, one that splits the world apart; right along the sectarian lines (where science counts as a sect too)!

I suspect that you want a scientific answer, but the problem is that science itself does not know what God is (i.e. it knows about God as much as the older brother religion tells it). So how can you prove or disprove something when there is no clear definition of the “problem area”. However, if we borrow some of the definitions of God from religion like “He is the source of all”, “He is omnipresent”, “He is omnipotent”, “He is eternal (i.e. outside of space and time)” then Zoran’s “Geometric Concept of Matter” proves each one of these definitions (of course if the theory itself is positively verified by the broader scientific community) ;-)

On the other hand, how do you prove that God does not exist? This is the burden that science took upon itself, and we are still waiting for the definite proof. Can you really assume that because there is no need for Something, therefore certainly It does not exist? Or can you really assume that by disputing few statements in the Bible you can negate the God of ALL religions?

]]> By: Vipul http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-9 Vipul Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:18:18 +0000 http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-9 First of all , how do you prove GOD exists? First of all , how do you prove GOD exists?

]]> By: Nito http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-8 Nito Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:14:31 +0000 http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-8 What is interesting is that Sri Yukteswar's book “The Holy Science” gives the perfect philosophical background for the mentioned new theory. It was written more than 100 years ago with the primary purpose to "point out the harmony underlying the various religions, and to help in binding them together." Considering that nowadays science is like a religion to many people, one does hope that this book will serve also to bind science and religion together. What is interesting is that Sri Yukteswar’s book “The Holy Science” gives the perfect philosophical background for the mentioned new theory. It was written more than 100 years ago with the primary purpose to “point out the harmony underlying the various religions, and to help in binding them together.” Considering that nowadays science is like a religion to many people, one does hope that this book will serve also to bind science and religion together.

]]> By: Kum http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-7 Kum Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:22:31 +0000 http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-7 Very concise and right into the centre, Nito! Surely, it looks promising to see more and more people opening their minds towards scientific understanding of Spiritual Realities. Very concise and right into the centre, Nito!
Surely, it looks promising to see more and more people opening their minds towards scientific understanding of Spiritual Realities.

]]> By: Nito http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-6 Nito Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:30:39 +0000 http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-6 Thank you Walter! :-) Thank you Walter! :-)

]]> By: Walter Cruttenden http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-5 Walter Cruttenden Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:58:25 +0000 http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-5 Nito - Love your work. It makes perfect sense. Keep it up! Walter Nito – Love your work. It makes perfect sense. Keep it up!

Walter

]]>