Comments for About Science, Religion and Life http://holyscience.wordpress.com by Nito Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:35:09 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 Comment on The Wholesome Believer by Nito http://holyscience.wordpress.com/the-wholesome-believer/#comment-13 Nito Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:35:09 +0000 http://holyscience.wordpress.com/?page_id=43#comment-13 Short answer is YES! The longer one is that man should love God as Father, Mother, Friend and Beloved. God is everything, everybody, everywhere and all of the time, because He (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satchitananda" rel="nofollow">Existence, Consciousness & Bliss</a>) is the substance that creates matter (see http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/). The plot (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lila" rel="nofollow">lila</a>) of this creation is that One became many, projected them 'out' of Himself, gave them independence to think and act as they wish, and is eagerly expecting them to return (back where they came from). He also designed this drama (of life) in such a way to make sure that the question is not if they (His children) would come back, but when. Even though they could spend many, many incarnations in trying to find Love in the various things of the universe, they will ultimately figure out that to catch the Giver (of all gifts) is the best thing. And that's when the courtship starts and the Beloved has to be satisfied with one's offering before the marriage is arranged. Short answer is YES!

The longer one is that man should love God as Father, Mother, Friend and Beloved. God is everything, everybody, everywhere and all of the time, because He (Existence, Consciousness & Bliss) is the substance that creates matter (see http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/). The plot (lila) of this creation is that One became many, projected them ‘out’ of Himself, gave them independence to think and act as they wish, and is eagerly expecting them to return (back where they came from). He also designed this drama (of life) in such a way to make sure that the question is not if they (His children) would come back, but when. Even though they could spend many, many incarnations in trying to find Love in the various things of the universe, they will ultimately figure out that to catch the Giver (of all gifts) is the best thing. And that’s when the courtship starts and the Beloved has to be satisfied with one’s offering before the marriage is arranged.

]]> Comment on The Wholesome Believer by lennylion http://holyscience.wordpress.com/the-wholesome-believer/#comment-12 lennylion Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:01:52 +0000 http://holyscience.wordpress.com/?page_id=43#comment-12 do you love god as a member of your family????? do you love god as a member of your family?????

]]> Comment on In the beginning was the Vibration… by Nito http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-10 Nito Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:40:39 +0000 http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-10 Interesting question Vipul, one that splits the world apart; right along the sectarian lines (where science counts as a sect too)! I suspect that you want a scientific answer, but the problem is that science itself does not know what God is (i.e. it knows about God as much as the older brother religion tells it). So how can you prove or disprove something when there is no clear definition of the "problem area". However, if we borrow some of the definitions of God from religion like "He is the source of all", "He is omnipresent", "He is omnipotent", "He is eternal (i.e. outside of space and time)" then Zoran's "Geometric Concept of Matter" proves each one of these definitions (of course if the theory itself is positively verified by the broader scientific community) ;-) On the other hand, how do you prove that God does not exist? This is the burden that science took upon itself, and we are still waiting for the definite proof. Can you really assume that because there is no need for Something, therefore certainly It does not exist? Or can you really assume that by disputing few statements in the Bible you can negate the God of ALL religions? Interesting question Vipul, one that splits the world apart; right along the sectarian lines (where science counts as a sect too)!

I suspect that you want a scientific answer, but the problem is that science itself does not know what God is (i.e. it knows about God as much as the older brother religion tells it). So how can you prove or disprove something when there is no clear definition of the “problem area”. However, if we borrow some of the definitions of God from religion like “He is the source of all”, “He is omnipresent”, “He is omnipotent”, “He is eternal (i.e. outside of space and time)” then Zoran’s “Geometric Concept of Matter” proves each one of these definitions (of course if the theory itself is positively verified by the broader scientific community) ;-)

On the other hand, how do you prove that God does not exist? This is the burden that science took upon itself, and we are still waiting for the definite proof. Can you really assume that because there is no need for Something, therefore certainly It does not exist? Or can you really assume that by disputing few statements in the Bible you can negate the God of ALL religions?

]]> Comment on In the beginning was the Vibration… by Vipul http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-9 Vipul Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:18:18 +0000 http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-9 First of all , how do you prove GOD exists? First of all , how do you prove GOD exists?

]]> Comment on In the beginning was the Vibration… by Nito http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-8 Nito Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:14:31 +0000 http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-8 What is interesting is that Sri Yukteswar's book “The Holy Science” gives the perfect philosophical background for the mentioned new theory. It was written more than 100 years ago with the primary purpose to "point out the harmony underlying the various religions, and to help in binding them together." Considering that nowadays science is like a religion to many people, one does hope that this book will serve also to bind science and religion together. What is interesting is that Sri Yukteswar’s book “The Holy Science” gives the perfect philosophical background for the mentioned new theory. It was written more than 100 years ago with the primary purpose to “point out the harmony underlying the various religions, and to help in binding them together.” Considering that nowadays science is like a religion to many people, one does hope that this book will serve also to bind science and religion together.

]]> Comment on In the beginning was the Vibration… by Kum http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-7 Kum Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:22:31 +0000 http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-7 Very concise and right into the centre, Nito! Surely, it looks promising to see more and more people opening their minds towards scientific understanding of Spiritual Realities. Very concise and right into the centre, Nito!
Surely, it looks promising to see more and more people opening their minds towards scientific understanding of Spiritual Realities.

]]> Comment on In the beginning was the Vibration… by Nito http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-6 Nito Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:30:39 +0000 http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-6 Thank you Walter! :-) Thank you Walter! :-)

]]> Comment on In the beginning was the Vibration… by Walter Cruttenden http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-5 Walter Cruttenden Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:58:25 +0000 http://holyscience.wordpress.com/in-the-beginning-was-the-vibration/#comment-5 Nito - Love your work. It makes perfect sense. Keep it up! Walter Nito – Love your work. It makes perfect sense. Keep it up!

Walter

]]> Comment on Molecules, atoms, neutrons, protons, electrons, quarks, …God by Nito http://holyscience.wordpress.com#comment-4 Nito Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:55:28 +0000 http://holyscience.wordpress.com/?page_id=6#comment-4 Good news folks! Zoran has just published his new theory named "The Geometric Concept of Matter" on his site (http://www.zoran-ozimec.com/) :-) Good news folks!

Zoran has just published his new theory named “The Geometric Concept of Matter” on his site (http://www.zoran-ozimec.com/) :-)

]]> Comment on Molecules, atoms, neutrons, protons, electrons, quarks, …God by Nito http://holyscience.wordpress.com#comment-3 Nito Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:41:10 +0000 http://holyscience.wordpress.com/?page_id=6#comment-3 Sorry Mavis, I can't really answer your question (cause I'm not the owner nor webmaster of the mentioned site), but based on my last discussion with Zoran, it might take another week or so... ;-) Sorry Mavis, I can’t really answer your question (cause I’m not the owner nor webmaster of the mentioned site), but based on my last discussion with Zoran, it might take another week or so… ;-)

]]>